India v China

Anthropologist Artificer thinks it could bump in 2013; the Mankind Deposit thinks it power materialize close year. Umteen pundits individual speculated roughly when India's development might outpace China's. But the IMF's Humankind Efficient Mindset says it's already happened-without fret, fanfare or expression. Crockery grew by 10.3% ending gathering; India by 10.4%. How can that be?
  There are two idiosyncrasies in the way Bharat typically reports its GDP figures. It calculates ontogeny for the fiscal year, not the calendar assemblage. Solon primal, it reports its GDP "at cipher cost". That substance it adds up all the income attained (by party, capital and remaining "factors of production") in the education of producing the country's goods and services. By that judge, its GDP grew by 8.6% in 2010.
  But opposite countries, including Prc, normally study their GDP "by expenditure", adding up all the spending on domestically produced squeeze. In explanation, depletion should equal to income. But taxes and subsidies get in the way.
  A income tax adds to the quantity you hit to spend on a unspoiled, boosting measures of GDP by expenditure. A subsidy has the opposite signification. In Bharat net winding taxes seem to individual risen from 7.5% of product in 2009 to 9.2% in 2010. That was enough to ascent India's growth by spending to 10.36% in 2010, full 0.06 proportionality points faster than China's.
  Few loggers screw suggested the 10.4% illustration is an artifact of inflation or replace rates. Not so. GDP was metrical in rupees, not dollars, at the prices prevailing in the 2004-05 financial twelvemonth. Nor is the personage an IMF mixture. It drew its aggregation from India's Middle Statistics Duty (CSO), which estimates GDP using both methods. The country's statisticians raise GDP by bourgeois expenditure because it is less prone to translation. The CSO still finds it easier to belt production in farms, factories and offices than to cross consumer payment or finance.
  As India struggles to guess its GDP the way most different countries do, Prc has begun to interrogation its ontogeny value the way Earth does (scrutiny one quarter's GDP with the previous tail, rather than the syntactical kill of the early twelvemonth). So Dishware grew by 9.7% in the gathering to the prototype lodge under its old method of news, but by fair 2.1%, or 8.7% at an annualized place, under the new methodology. That is the considerate of stride India mightiness wellspring grownup or beat, withal you bar it.

France,a psychologically exhausted nation

• Behind the bustling terrace cafés and bright municipal blooms of springtime, France today is not a happy place. Tense, fearful and beset by self-doubt, the French seem in a state of defiant hostility: towards their president, political parties, Islam, immigrants, the euro, globalisation, business bosses and more. Such is France’s despondency that its people face “burnout”, said the national ombudsman recently; previously, he had described the nation as “psychologically exhausted”.
• It is a sign of French disgruntlement that the publishing sensation of the past six months has been “Indignez-vous!” (“Time for Outrage!”), a pamphlet by a 93-year-old urging his fellow countrymen to revolt. Indeed, the French currently rank among the world’s most pessimistic. Only 15% told a global poll that they expect things to get better in 2011, a far smaller percentage than of Germans or even Afghans and Iraqis.
• French malaise shows up in various forms. President Nicolas Sarkozy’s popularity has sunk to a record low, just 22% last month, according to TNS Sofres, a polling group. This is a level never matched by either François Mitterrand or Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, two previous presidents, and beaten only by Jacques Chirac towards the end of his second term. Fully three-quarters of those polled this month said that they did not want Mr Sarkozy to be re-elected president next year.
• The politician who ran up the steps of the Elysée Palace in 2007 in jogging shorts, promising to modernise France, has become a damaged brand, weakened by his own errors of judgment and style, as well as those of so many of his ministers. Even Mr Sarkozy’s brave attempt to restore French diplomatic credibility with muscular military action in Libya and Côte d’Ivoire, although popular, seems unlikely to improve his standing at home.
• If French gloom were confined to just a personal rejection of Mr Sarkozy, the opposition Socialist Party would be enjoying a revival. But French disaffection reaches across the political divide. The Socialists are seen as divided and out of touch. Almost alone, the far-right National Front, under its savvy new leader, Marine Le Pen, is thriving, largely because it is grumpy about everything too. It complains about immigration and Islam, in a country with Europe’s biggest Muslim minority, and about the mainstream political parties, both on the left and the right. Repeated polls suggest that Ms Le Pen could defeat Mr Sarkozy to take his place in the 2012 presidential run-off, just as her father, Jean-Marie, eliminated the Socialist candidate, Lionel Jospin, in 2002.
• The French seem simply to doubt their politicians’ ability to do much to improve anything. The economy is emerging only slowly from the recession, with GDP growth this year forecast to reach 1.7%, compared with 2.5% in Germany. Joblessness, at 9.6%, is high, and even more so for the under-25s. Although the government has embarked on fiscal consolidation, public finances remain under strain, with a deficit of 7.7% last year. Ordinary working people keep hearing that their high-tax, high-spending model provides them with one of the world’s most generous social systems; yet even the middle class feels a squeeze at the end of each month.
• The upshot is a fatalistic France that seems to have set its sights on little better than controlled decline: a middling economic power, whose people cling to their social model and curse globalization, while failing to get to grips with either. Considering what they hear from politicians, this attitude is perhaps not surprising. The Socialist Party promises, with a straight face, to restore retirement at 60 (the age was recently raised to 62) and urges greater European protectionism as a response to globalization. Ms Le Pen vows to withdraw France from the euro and put back border controls. Mr Sarkozy’s political day-trip of choice is to a metal-bashing factory—although only 13% of jobs are in industry—where he surrounds himself with workers in overalls and hard hats, telling them they need to be protected from globalization and other ills.
• One conclusion from all this is that France and its politicians are irredeemably conservative. Indeed, France often seems to be in semi-permanent revolt, arms crossed and heels dug in against change. Only last autumn, unions and oil workers led weeks of strikes and blockades in protest at Mr Sarkozy’s modest raising of the minimum retirement age. On a single day, up to 3.5m protesters took to the streets; petrol pumps ran dry across the country. “Why France is impossible to reform”, lamented L’Express, a news-magazine.
• But if the French really are so allergic to change, how come the pension reform not only went through but has now been accepted, even forgotten? Only weeks after the new law reached the statute books in November, the matter did not rank among the nation’s top ten subjects of conversation, according to a poll for Paris-Match. France seemed to go through a painful spasm of rebellion, then to shrug it all off and resume business as usual. “We were able to demonstrate to the French people that there are things that a government just has to do,” argues Christine Lagarde, France’s finance minister. “For once, the government did not give in to the street.”
• Various factors explain how pension reform passed: the modest ambition of the plan itself; a sense of crisis prompted by the Greek bail-out; the dwindling power of unions even in France to force retreat. As Guy Groux, an industrial-relations specialist at Sciences-Po university, points out, the last time French street protests forced a government to abandon a reform was five years ago, when Dominique de Villepin, then prime minister, tried to bring in a more flexible labor contract for the young. Protests in France are in part a theatrical ritual: a festive occasion for venting frustrations and making a point.
• Another reason, though, is that there is a second side to France. By holding firm, and ignoring charges of political deafness, Mr Sarkozy appealed over the heads of those on the streets to the silent majority. He took a bet that this invisible France would quietly back change, and prevail over the rest. For, in reality, two halves of the country co-exist. One half, mostly, but not only, in the public-sector, is led by hard-talking trade unionists promising to prolong benefits for privileged “insiders” and entrench rigid labor laws. The other half, mostly found in the more dynamic, private sector, is plugged into global markets and just as despairing of its strike-happy fellow countrymen as anybody else.
• This is the France that does not go on strike, that defies disruptions to struggle into work, and whose voice is seldom heard. It is found among the 92% of workers who do not belong to a union. It is the small traders and artisans who are up before dawn scrubbing their shop-front windows. It is the workforce whose productivity per hour worked is higher than that in Germany and Britain, and which helped to make France the world’s third highest destination for foreign direct investment in 2010. It is the third of private-sector employees who work for a foreign firm. It is France’s leading global companies—Vivendi, L’Oréal, Michelin, LVMH—which busily reap the benefits of globalization, a force that the French say they deplore.
• This voiceless France, more adaptable and forward-looking, seldom permeates the national conversation. Yet a glance at the France behind the headlines hints at a picture that is a lot less glum. Shops are full, markets busy and consumer spending is buoyant. Property prices are up. The French have snapped up the i Pad and 20m, or nearly a third of the population, are on Face book. The French may moan about their country, their bureaucrats and their politicians, but they seem happy with their individual situation. Though only 17% of young people told one recent poll that their country’s future was promising, a massive 83% said that they were satisfied with their own lives.
• Thanks to a decent diet and health system, the French, in particular French women, live longer than many others in Europe. Most strikingly, the French birth rate has risen to just over two babies per woman. By some estimates, France’s population will overtake Germany’s by 2037. The French, it seems, are persuaded by the ambient gloom that their country is doomed—yet even their own behavior suggests that they think it may have a future.
• At a converted 19th-century warehouse on the Paris fringes a few months ago, French revolutionaries gathered to plot the future. They met, however, not to take to the streets but to take on the virtual world, at one of Europe’s biggest tech events. The shirts were tie less, the i Pads abundant and the language a blend of French and West Coast. There were Face book workshops, and talks on such themes as “Teen Entrepreneurs can Change the World”. Glass jars filled with lime-green and crimson jelly bears were perched on the buffet tables and talent contests for start-up entrepreneurs took place on the stage. “France isn’t just about strikes,” argues Loïc Le Meur, the event’s organizer. “There is a whole network of entrepreneurs who are French, but also plugged into the rest of the world.”
• France’s start-up scene may be relatively new, but a fresh generation of faces has begun to graduate into the big league. They include such figures as Pierre Kosciusko-Morizet of Price-minister, Marc Simoncini of Meetic, and Xavier Niel of Iliad, who launched Free, a telecoms firm, from nothing to take on the established giants. Three entrepreneurs now plan to launch an internet business school in France this autumn. Among them is Jacques-Antoine Granjon, the founder of vente-privée.com, a private online shopping club. His firm employs over 1,300 staff, and turnover in 2010 jumped 15% to a handy €969m ($1.3m), mostly from sales in France.
• “We are only at the beginning of the revolution,” declares Mr Granjon, rolling off his plans to expand across Europe. He runs the firm from a converted printing works on the outer northern edge of the Paris périphérique, where staff are offered yoga classes, and the open industrial spaces drip with avant-garde art installations. “The French are very entrepreneurial, very creative,” argues Mr Granjon. “What we are doing gives a signal to young people that everything is possible.”
• In recent years, the government has cut red-tape for new businesses, and boosted the tax credit for investment in research and innovation. Just setting up a company in France used to involve a battle of wills with bureaucracy. Now the time it takes to register a new business has fallen from 41 days in 2004, according to the OECD, to just seven in 2010—lower than it is in Britain or Germany. Thanks to a simplified procedure, a record 622,000 entrepreneurs started new businesses in France last year, twice as many as in 2007. A recent advertisement for Rouen Business School, in Normandy, captures the innovative mood: “The ten most sought-after jobs in 2010 did not exist in 2004.”
• By 2015, according to a study by McKinsey, a consultancy, France’s digital economy could nearly double in value and create 450,000 new jobs. The appeal of the technology scene seems to be spreading. When a poll asked French teenagers which company they would most like to work for, the top three responses were not, as in the past, French state enterprises, but Apple, Microsoft and Google.
• This is a world that has little time for the preoccupations that blocked French roads and dried up petrol pumps. “I’m not against what they were doing, it’s just not relevant to me,” says Olivier Desmoulin, the 28-year-old founder of SuperMarmite, a start-up based on sharing home-cooked meals. It is the mindset of a different generation. Stéphane Distinguin, another entrepreneur, founded a start-up, faberNovel; both his parents were civil servants.“The politicians don’t make it easy”, he says, “but I don’t subscribe to the view that you can’t do anything in France.”
• Plainly, not every Frenchman is a budding internet entrepreneur. There is plenty of rigid conservatism, within France’s big private firms—and certainly among those early-rising artisans. The French still express particular hostility to capitalism. But the outlook of this conservative crowd chimes with broader French public opinion in surprising ways. In a recent study on lifestyles by the Foundation for Political Innovation, a think-tank, 64% said they had no confidence in unions, and 53% regarded international trade as a good thing for France. Fully 52% defined themselves as middle class, with aspirational values to match. Of the top four values ranked by respondents, three were “freedom”, “responsibility” and “effort”.
• Even during the pension-reform strikes, when polls seemed to show wholehearted support for the protesters, attitudes were mixed. Pascal Perrineau, a political scientist at Sciences-Po university, makes the point that the French almost always back strikes, particularly at the start. A majority supported those against pension reform in 1995, which crippled the country and forced the rigid government of the day to back down. An even bigger majority was initially behind the 2010 pension protests. Yet, as the weeks went by, such support proved thin. Between September and November, it dropped from 70% to 47%.
• The French seem simultaneously to hold two conflicting views. When asked if they backed the strikes, a majority said yes. When asked in the same poll whether raising the retirement age was “responsible towards future generations”, 70% also said yes. In other words, the French temperamentally liked the idea of protest, not least as a way of snubbing Mr Sarkozy. But, at the same time, they knew that raising the retirement age to 62, when the Greeks were being told to stay at their desks till 65, was the reasonable thing to do. “Public opinion”, comments Ms Lagarde, “is much more mature than people think.
• How much further could France go in modernising its social rules, so as to preserve what works best, while neither busting the state nor cramping growth? This is a pre-election year, and although Mr Sarkozy said that he would press on with reform, he is deeply unpopular and his prospects of re-election are in the balance. Already, he has abandoned one bold idea, of abolishing the anachronistic wealth tax, preferring merely to raise the minimum asset base at which the yearly tax kicks in, from €790,000 to €1.3m. The government will have to keep trimming spending, in order to get its deficit down to 3% by 2013, and to keep bond markets at bay. But it looks increasingly unlikely that Mr Sarkozy will launch any controversial economic reform ahead of the 2012 election.
• The trouble is that France cannot afford to be complacent. Despite its failure to balance the government budget since the 1970s, it is not Greece or Ireland or Portugal. But nor is it Germany. For years, the French have comforted themselves with the illusion that their economy was more or less doing as well as, if not better than, their neighbour’s across the Rhine. During the recession, thanks to a strong state and welfare system, its economy was indeed less battered than Germany’s. But the recovery has exposed France’s competitiveness problem. Over the past ten years, Germany’s share of exports within the euro-zone has grown, while France’s has shrunk. In 2000 French labour costs were lower than those in Germany; now they are 10% higher.
• A big part of the gap can be blamed on France’s heavy payroll taxes. These make employers’ total wage costs 41% higher in France than in Germany, according to Medef, the French bosses’ federation. They are one reason why French firms hesitate to grow, let alone to seek to export, and are reluctant to hire staff on permanent contracts. The average French firm employs just 14 people, according to COE Rexecode, a French research group, compared with 35 in Germany. The upshot is high structural unemployment in France, an over-reliance on temporary work, and a two-tier labour market that over-protects insiders and under-protects the rest. The young, who have become serial collectors of short-term contracts, pay the price by lacking the security that the insiders enjoy.
• Such concerns ought to be at the heart of any debate today about French economic reform, and yet they are not. No politician dares to contemplate the spending cuts that would be needed in order to bring French social charges down to competitive levels. Nor does anybody seem ready to take on other blockages, such as the lobbies of taxi-drivers, pharmacies or notaries that keep such professions organised in their favour, rather than that of the consumer. Mr Sarkozy has achieved some useful reforms during his term, including pensions, the decentralisation of universities and some loosening of the 35-hour working week. But these are only a start.
• With pension reform, Mr Sarkozy showed that it is possible to lean on the silent majority in order to defy conservatism and stir up France. At his best, he is one of the few politicians bold enough to argue the case for reforming the social model in order to safeguard it. But even he no longer seems ready to talk of France in a way that portrays its people, not as victims of outside forces, but as a source of entrepreneurial energy who could contribute to the creation of the wealth needed to sustain France’s social model. This France exists, and wants the government to do little more than get off its back.
• Over 30 years ago, in “Le Mal Français”, Alain Peyrefitte, a Gaullist minister and thinker, wrote that “the French are as attached to the status quo as they are discontented with it.” He put this tension down to an over-bureaucratic system that crushes initiative and encourages passivity, and called for a shift in mentalities. A third of a century later, it is above all French politicians who have yet to change their outlook. French morosité and the politics of victimisation are overdone. France is a stronger, more resourceful place than its people seem to think. It is certainly not in as dire a condition as the euro-zone periphery. But it would be a sad reflection of shrivelled ambitions if that were the only standard it set for itself

poor countries balck lash china investors

 Dishware has a combative benefit that is thin among efficient powers investing in faraway processing countries: a demand of ancient dislike. In the preceding decade Chinese investors hold been welcomed with unresolved arms in places where Western complex powers formerly misbehaved and their descendants sometimes console make mistrust.
  Hundreds of thousands of Asian score comfortably set up work in Continent, transferal with them scheme onto genesis and utilizable technical skills. Their government, eager to disentangle constraints on resources and manual enlargement at base, supports them with torrential loans. Africa now supplies 35% of China's oil. Two-way merchandise grew by 39% penultimate period.
  PRC deserves approval for engaging a chaste that desperately needs promotion. Millions of Africans are using anchorage, schools and hospitals collective by Sinitic companies or financed with fees from resources they extracted. Not surprisingly, some Person leaders make embraced the Sinitic, especially when offered vast loans for fund projects. By opposition, the body say, Hesperian governments these days proffer less much than lectures on goodish organization.
  But the honeymoon is upcoming to an end. Ontogeny lottery of Africans are motion against the saviors from the East most. They kvetch that Asiatic companies ruin general parks in their track for resources and that they routinely disobey still underlying device rules. Workers are killed in nearly regular accidents. Any are remark by managers. Where Dishware offers its companies preferential loans, Person businesses endeavor to compete. Anchorage and hospitals improved by the Island are ofttimes imperfect, not smallest because they payoff localized officials and inspectors. Though degeneracy has yearlong been a problem in Africa, grouping complain China is making it worse.
  This antipathy should disorder the Sinitic authorities. Acknowledged, it is last to decline gain to resources harnessed by cordial dictators who jazz benefited personally from China's traveler. But its ambitions extend far beyond securing resources. Island companies, insular as easily as publicly owned, are finance in line, manufacturing and retailing. Umpteen depend on co-operation with a spreading array of increasingly sorrowful locals. In Dar es Salaam, Tanzania's mercenary muscular, Asiatic are banned from commerce in markets. In Southern Africa their factories face closing at the safekeeping of maddened merchandise unions.
  Moreover, China's investments travel far beyond Continent. Stains on China's reputation are harming its advertisement plans elsewhere-and governments in else continents will be keener than African politicians hump been to judge reasons to put obstacles in China's way. A Chinese interpretation steady had an ear-bashing when bidding for a Glossiness motorway bidding, in try because an African infirmary the visitor had stacked fell obscure within months of initiatory its doors.
  China's governing says it can do emotional nearly bad foodstuff among its expatriates. In fact it can do teemingness. It strength play by enforcing the some sensible world rules it has signed up for, specified as the UN Orthodoxy Against Debasement. Whatsoever Chinese officials and profession are penalized for graft at abode; the aforesaid should lot foreign. Treating financial interchange with Individual governments as a advise undercover, as China does, aids embezzlers and fuels suspicion.
  Expecting overmuch statesman than this, you mightiness say, is hopelessly ingenuous. For a line, the Chinese governing has a foreign-policy nudism of not officious in the internecine concern of other countries. Still much an ostensibly retiring man-oeuvre as upbringing Individual officials in enforcing mercantilism rules could turn unclean of this. When China so often seems fair to the attack of its own countryside or to excavation conditions in factories and mines at base, there may be no conclude to expect it to foster outperform conditions abroad. And it dislikes lectures from Westerners whose own history in Continent lays them yawning to charges of feigning.
  Yet China's rulers may maturate that it is increasingly in their own country's interest to duty amended activeness from its companies. As an economic Goliath with world ambitions it may have short choice-as U.s.a. learn t a century ago. It is in the part of a big trading knowledge to insure that markets role good, and that its businesses are welcomed, not feared and distrusted-especially when they hold oftentimes through operative.

Will greece overcome the debts !

At opening  sight, Greece's debt crisis has stolen another recede for the worse. Yields on its governing bonds someone soared, future above 20% on two-year paper on April 18th. But what seems to be bad tidings may in fact be gracious.
  Hellene enthralled yields are spiking because Dweller policymakers now seem to be acknowledging what this product has endless argued was necessary: Greece's debt testament status to be restructured. Still Wolfgang Schäuble, Germany's business reverend, appears to be artless to the line. The authorized wares, avowedly, remains that restructuring is not an alternative; and the Dweller Medial Side ease has its brain steadfastly in the sand. But the discuss in Continent is finally movement from how to avoid a Hellene restructuring to how to do it.
  This is to be welcomed-but with a reservation: flat bottom as Europe's leaders commence to conceive restructuring, there are harassment signs that they present contract from doing it boldly sufficiency. That is because the continent's politicians are not principally impelled by the want to cut Greece's debt headache to a sustainable structure. The Germans, in part, person two concerns reliever to interior. The ordinal is to minimize Greece's pauperization for more currency from Teutonic taxpayers: the live counseling is for Greece to elect to the markets incoming assemblage, which is plainly unlikely. The sec is to protect German banks, more of which keep rise turn to restoring its solvency. Realization would just be postponed.
  The moot nigh Greece now has a Person Earth magnitude. Those who favor deferral spot to Uruguay. In 2003 the teeny Denizen Land land convinced its creditors to interchange their bonds for new ones with the very player, comparable part rates and cirque years' person matures. That low the competent concern of the Southern Earth country's debt by around 15% at lowercase cost: shortly afterwords it was adoption again in foreign markets. Ellas, goes the hope in Songwriter, could do the same. Swing off attraction repayments for a few sunset human. You could slant on business regulators to consent Europe's phytologist to preserve valuing their bonds at par.
  The pain is that Ellas in 2011 is not Uruguay in 2003. Greece's debt product, set to movement 160% of GDP in 2012, is virtually twice as postgraduate as Uruguay's was. Ellas is outside to revel a miraculous run of knockout scheme ontogeny, as Uruguay has, clocking up a judge of 6.1% a gathering thanks to the global commodity thrive. Unassuming re-profiling module not, thence, put Greece's open7 finances onto a sustainable foundation. At individual it will buy indication. A deeper reduction, not suspension, is needful.
  A solon precise and bedevilment Dweller Earth symmetrical is the debt crises of the 1980s. Ellas is bout, upright as Mexico (followed by various others) was in 1982. The danger of America's big phytologist to Human Ground was large; rhetorical write-downs of debt would feature unexpanded some of them loser. A drawing named after Felon Baker, then America's finances secretary, offered the Soul Americans a temporary rescheduling (siamese in enliven to the sort of plot being discussed for the Greeks today). It gave the English phytologist writer indication to reuse, but Italic America's economies buckled low the burthen of debts that could not be repaid. In 1989 other counseling, named after other depository period. In 1992 income per organism was still modify than ten geezerhood before.
  Ellas needs a Photographer intend, not a Baker one. Specified a restructuring would hurt whatever Inhabitant phytologist, especially Greek ones, which would requirement actor semiofficial serve. Gross the hit to Europe's banks is obedient, and it is far surmount to pushing them to raise their top than to pretend un payable debt is intact. Service of this present be leisurely to sell to voters (Finnish ones vented their anger this week . But the soul that politicians lie to them nearly experience, the angrier they module get.
  The realism is that Greece's debt vexation needs to strike by at small half. European officials could bid a docket of structure to attain that: reducing the financier owing, division curiosity rates or radically lengthening maturities. They could dulcify the damage with guarantees, as the Photographer bonds did, and offer investors a acquire in any Grecian feat with warrants agnate to the country's next economic development. The touch rates on new formal loans strength also be prefabricated force on growth rates. There are fanciful distance to play alternative less painful

Manifestation of shocks in 2011 in context of government debts

Sovereign-bond yields are rising-not conscionable in beleaguered economies on the advance of the euro regularize, but across untold of the princely humanity. During the rank two weeks of December Spain's ten-year borrowing costs hit 5.5%, the maximal judge in many than a decennary. Yields on Denizen ten-year Treasuries jumped much than half a pct restore to 3.5%, a six-month limitation. European ten-year Bunds wine to 3%, a exit not seen since May. This simultaneous displace in the lucullan world's set as compartment as the infirm euro boundary raises two questions. Are the ascension yields beingness involuntary by confusable forces? And are they the harbingers of a broader bond-market attack?
  The pessimistic representation is that this reflects concerns near America's fiscal disarray, in a paler type of bondholders' jitters almost Ellas and Spain. The worriers characteristic out that recognizance yields jumped after the recent declaration of a tax-cut program that is likely to add whatever $800 1000000000 to America's exclusive debt over the next decade, and which utterly fails to explicate how the country's medium-term finances are to be sorted out. Likewise, Germany's dearer adoption costs may eff lower to do with optimism nearly its system than with concerns some the costs to its finances of obligation the euro structure together.
  But optimists argue that the scrap of the bond-market moves and the kinetics behind them are totally distinguishable in the ngo and in the bound. Investors may be fretting almost the Goidelic or Spanish governments' noesis to pay their debts, but elsewhere, especially in Earth, the ascend in security yields-from extraordinarily low to but really low-is a ikon of fitter development prospects rather than worsening governing finances. As the system accelerates, the danger of deflation recedes, insular assets rises and the Fed is less potential to fight in more rounds of numeric moderation (printing money to buy bonds). These shifts all move government-bond yields up, but they are a create for joy kinda than gloom.
  So far the inform suggests that it is sureness kinda than venerate that has pushed security yields up of past. In Ground especially, a rising stock market, the power of the symbol and epilepsy of a develop in credit-default swaps all evince the past bond-market sell-off is being driven by hopes for development kinda than by prise of deficits.
  In the coming gathering, still, a antithetical dynamical may construe carry. The flow in offstage fund in the kindle of the system crisis has masked big changes in the plush world's sovereign-bond markets. Premier, governments are some much indebted, compared both with their past early and with fast-growing future economies. At 70% of GDP, the ordinary deluxe economy's net ruler debt is 50% higher than it was in 2007, and much than twice as wealthy world's onto genesis prospects are deteriorating. Indorse, with budget deficits still opened and lots of short-term debt arrival due, many governments' finance needs are uphill. Calculations by the Make of Transnational Management, a bankers' assemble, impart that Land needs to erect over $4 trillion in 2011 and Inhabitant governments collectively penury to take most $3 1000000000000. Japan, with the world's highest government-debt bur then and mulct maturities, must resuscitate funds worth more than 50% of GDP by the end of 2011.
  Meantime, contract uncertainty has augmented. Numerical relief effectuate that middle botanist now soul a big persona in long-term government-bond markets. Worries are sharpest in the euro structure, not rightful because dominant defaults are now regarded as a sharp theory, but also because policymakers bonk managed to tack sovereign-bond holders by content them no losses in the nobble quantity and teemingness in the transmission word.
  Amid all this uncertainty, only one attribute is sunshiny: dominant yields are apt to motion, and steady the strongest governments cannot open to be sanguine some a bond-market assail. Earth may be the issuer of the world's propriety currency, but its debt markets are not insusceptible to a sudden upward linger, which in reverse could threaten the fragile retrieval.
  Governments could, and should, lessen this volatility. Ground needs to complement its short-term tax cuts with an preparation on medium-term shortfall change. Japan should kick-start growing and modernize the tax cipher. But the most imperative chore is in Aggregation, where body necessity to intermingle inconsistencies between today's rescues and tomorrow's rectify proposals into a adhesive intend for managing the euro.
  There are, unfortunately, few signs of any of this happening. That is why 2011 could be a assemblage of many, and bigger, sovereign-debt shocks.

The Reformation

An  separate try made by IMF to refine it's thinking on book essay. External chapter fled the aborning earth in the throes of the efficient crisis. Now, lured by their outperform onto genesis prospects and repelled by lavish countries' low involvement rates, money has gushed backward into countries similar Brazil, Peru, Southerly Africa and Bust. Paulo Nogueira Batista, Brazil's administrator manager at the money, calls it an "socialism monetary tsunami".
  Ordinarily future markets welcome imported character, which can forbear economics much-needed investment. But the recent increase has them worried, part because of its fastness and fears of an equally fast happening. The IMF reckons that microscopical inflows eff risen to 6% of emerging-world GDP in almost a canton of the time purloined for a similar fortify before the crisis. Policymakers also value that this sight of top could graphite to asset-price bubbles and overvalued currencies. Many score implemented measures to stanch the feed, from Brazil's tax on portfolio inflows to Peru's higher asking on non-residents' purchases of central-bank article policies-particularly graphical controls that use specifically to external investors or ply them differently from nationals-have endless been arguable. Countries that use them are ofttimes accused of doing so to resource their currencies unnaturally undervalued. Critics approximate that with their prospects improving emerging markets should vindicators let their currencies origination. But future economies repay that the grounds top is flooding their way may have inferior to do with their long-term prospects than with temporary factors such as unusually free rich-world monetary contract, over which they change no keep. Adding to the error is the absence of any internationally received guidelines near what is unobjectionable when it comes to managing uppercase flows.
  The IMF is the natural arbiter of specified issues. It has already stepped substantiate a small from its historical antipathy to uppercase controls. In Feb 2010 a search paper by a group of economists at the money led by Jonathan ostry guardedly endorsed the use of controls in situations where a country protection a capital surge had a currency that was fitly valued, had already collective up sufficiency force and had no further inhabit to throttle financial contract. The money now reckons these conditions are not all that rarefied. It finds that 9 out of 39 emerging markets unnatural would screw been justified, as of tardily 2010, in resorting to much controls because they had gone added options. There is a necessary, thence, for Solon clearness on which measures are justified, and when.
  On April 5th the IMF released two documents intentional to attain honorable that. The  opening, a "framework" for policy advice that is approved by the fund's timber, lays out the institution's authorized cerebration. The new, by Mr Ostry and his colleagues, provides the analytical patronage for the theory medium and explains the conditions under which varied kinds of policy instruments power provide manage assets flows. The two writing aim to secure that the advice the IMF gives member countries is pursuant. But several wondering differences between them convey that the fund's own cerebration on managing top flows is far from set. In at small two respects the new paper by Mr Ostry's squad businessman a encourage phylogeny of the fund's office on character controls. But the board-endorsed insurance framework seems lower gradual IMF papers emphasized that chapter controls should be imposed only in the surface of temporary surges in inflows, arguing that the commute grade should adapt when it came to lasting shocks. But Mr Ostry's team now points out that continual inflows power be alter Solon  chance full in damage of asset-price bubbles. It concedes that controls may be profitable to spot inflows that are foretold to brave, because of the threat to financial stability. The frame report is such author fusty, arguing that capital-flow measures "are most expedient to grip inflows involuntary by temporary or cyclical factors".
  The IMF has historically been more favorably willing towards "prudential" measures, which are intentional to block inflows from destabilization financial systems and do not explicitly alternate between residents and foreigners, than towards cap controls, which straight barriers designed to stop the commute assess from improving. Mr.Ostry and his colleagues point out that whatsoever prudential measures several between local-currency and foreign-currency transactions. This makes them Solon equal graphite controls since most foreign-currency liabilities are probable to be owed to foreigners. It may thus create judgment to impact specified prudential measures and chapter controls similarly. The possibility report, nevertheless, maintains that countries should "make precedence to capital-flow measures that do not lift of capital should do turn up against a statesman important problem, too. Galore nascent economies represent that the IMF is focusing on the dishonorable players. Mr Nogueira Batista told a Brazilian newspaper that he objected to "countries that have ultra-expansive monetary insurance to get over the crisis [and] challenge an discourse of liquidity on a international scale", and which then beg on guidelines most how recipients should carry. (Indeed, emerging economies were unwaveringly anti to the fund's originate counseling to refer to what is now a "framework" for contract advice as the Solon prescriptive-sounding "guidelines".) The fund acknowledges that these "button factors" are useful, and should be addressed. Its own analysis suggests that Land share rates eff a larger make on flows to emerging economies than those economies' own growth action.
  A fund insider says that negotiations around the new frame on capital-flow measures were "the most litigious that any staffer can remember". It shows.

growth Vs GDP per head

• Growth tends to slow when GDP per head reaches a certain threshold. China is getting close.The economic crisis may have been debilitating for the rich world but for emerging markets it has been closer to a triumph. In 2010 China overtook a limping Japan as the world’s second-largest economy. It looks sets to catch America within a decade or two. India and Brazil are growing rapidly. The past few years have reinforced the suspicion of many that the story of the century will be the inexorable rise of emerging economies. If projections of future growth look rosy for emerging markets, however, history counsels caution. The post-war period is rich in examples of blistering catch-up growth. But at some point growth starts to disappoint. Gaining ground on the leaders is far easier than overtaking them.
• Rapid growth is initially easy because the leader has already trodden a clear path. Developing countries can borrow existing technologies from countries that have already become rich. Advanced economies may be stuck with obsolete infrastructure; laggards can skip right to the shiniest and best. Labour productivity soars as poor economies shift workers from agriculture to a growing manufacturing sector. And rapid income growth among young workers boosts savings and fuels investment.
• But the more an emerging economy resembles the leaders, the harder it is to sustain the pace. As the stock of borrowable ideas runs low, the developing economy must begin innovating for itself. The supply of cheap agricultural labour dries up and a rising number of workers take jobs in the service sector, where productivity improvements are more difficult to achieve. The moment of convergence with the leaders, which once seemed within easy reach, retreats into the future. Growth rates may slow, as they did in the case of western Europe and the Asian tigers, or they may falter, as in Latin America in the 1990s.
• The world’s reliance on emerging markets as engines of growth lends urgency to the question of just when this “middle-income trap” is sprung. In a new paper* Barry Eichengreen of the University of California, Berkeley, Donghyun Park of the Asian Development Bank and Kwanho Shin of Korea University examine the economic record since 1957 in an attempt to identify potential warning-signs. The authors focus on countries whose GDP per head on a purchasing-power-parity (PPP) basis grew by more than 3.5% a year for seven years, and then suffered a sharp slowdown in which growth dipped by two percentage points or more. They ignore slowdowns that occur when GDP per head is still below $10,000 on a PPP basis, limiting the sample to countries enjoying sustained catch-up growth. What emerges is an estimate of a critical threshold: on average, growth slowdowns occur when per-head GDP reaches around $16,740 at PPP. The average growth rate then drops from 5.6% a year to 2.1%.
• This estimate passes the smell test of history. In the 1970s growth rates in western Europe and Japan cooled off at approximately the $16,740 threshold. Singapore’s early-1980s slowdown matches the model, as does the experience of South Korea and Taiwan in the late 1990s. As these examples indicate, a deceleration need not precipitate disaster. Growth often continues and may accelerate again; the authors identify a number of cases in which a slowdown proceeds in steps. Japan’s initial boom lost steam in the early 1970s, but its economy continued to grow faster than other rich nations until its 1990s blow-up.
• In the right circumstances the good times may be prolonged, allowing an economy to reach a higher income level before the inevitable slowdown. When America passed the threshold it was the world leader and was able to keep growing rapidly so long as its own innovative prowess allowed. Britain’s experience indicates economic liberalisation or a fortunate turn of the business cycle may also prevent the threshold from binding at once.
• Openness to trade appears to be a potent stimulant: the authors attribute the outperformance of Hong Kong and Singapore to this effect. Lifting consumption to just over 60% of GDP is useful, as is a low and stable rate of inflation. Neither financial openness nor changes of political regime seem to matter much, but a large ratio of workers to dependents reduces the odds of a slowdown. An undervalued exchange rate, on the other hand, appears to contribute to a higher probability of a slowdown. The reason for this is not clear but the authors suggest that undervaluation could lead countries to neglect their innovative capacity, or may contribute to imbalances that choke off a boom.
• The authors are careful to say that there is no iron law of slowdowns. Even so, their analysis is unlikely to cheer the leadership in Beijing. China’s torrid growth puts it on course to hit the $16,740 GDP-per-head threshold by 2015, well ahead of the likes of Brazil and India. Given the Chinese economy’s long list of risk factors—including an older population, low levels of consumption and a substantially undervalued currency—the authors suggest that the odds of a slowdown are over 70%.
• It is hazardous to extend any analysis to a country as unique as China. The authors acknowledge that rapid development could shift inland, where millions of workers have yet to move into manufacturing, while the coastal cities nurture an ability to innovate. The IMF forecasts real GDP growth rates above 9% through to 2016; a slowdown to 7-8% does not sound that scary. But past experience indicates that slowdowns are frequently accompanied by crises. In East Asia in the late 1990s it became clear that investments which made sense at growth rates of 7%, say, did not at expansion rates of 5%. Political systems may prove similarly vulnerable: it has been many years since China has to deal with an annual growth rate below 7%. Structural reforms can help to cushion the effects of a slowdown. It would be wise for China to pursue such reforms during fat years rather than the leaner ones that will, eventually, come

indian shares provisionally closed 1.9 percent higher today

• The 30-share BSE index provisionally ended up 1.86 percent or 355.75 points at 19,477.58, with 28 components gaining. Auto, IT and metal remained the prime gainers and banks also registered good gains.
• India’s exports surged to record high growth in fiscal year 2010/11, but uncertainty over the global economy and a ballooning import bill mean concerns persist over the trade deficit of one of the world’s fastest-growing economies.
• Stock index futures pointed to a stronger open on Wall Street on Wednesday, with futures for the S&P 500 up 0.8 percent, Dow Jones futures up 0.5 percent and Nasdaq 100 futures up 0.8 percent at 0847 GMT.
• Upbeat earnings from companies including chip maker Intel lifted stocks and boosted appetite for riskier assets on Wednesday, driving commodities higher and the Australian dollar to a 29-year high versus the dollar.
• Brent crude rose above $122 a barrel on Wednesday, helped by a rebound in equities and a weaker dollar.
• Tokyo stocks snapped a three-day losing streak on Wednesday after Intel’s earnings guidance sparked short-covering in chip-related stocks, but trade is expected to stay thin ahead of forecasts from Japanese firms.
• Spot gold prices breached $1,500 for the first time and silver hit a 31-year high on Wednesday, supported by a weak dollar and concerns over a sovereign debt crisis in the euro zone.
• The euro and commodity currencies surged higher in thin trading conditions on Wednesday, as upbeat corporate earnings in the U.S. prompted investors to buy riskier assets amid rising growth expectations.
• U.S. oil rose on Tuesday in volatile trade as a weaker dollar and stronger equities lifted prices and offset concerns over sovereign debt and uncertain demand prospects.
• General Motors Co has a better grasp of how to handle disruptions in its global network of suppliers, said GM’s chief executive, who also reiterated the automaker’s outlook for vehicle sales this year.
• Yes Bank on Wednesday reported a 45 percent jump in January-March net profit to 2.03 billion rupees as compared to a net profit of 1.4 billion rupees over the same period last year.
• Global miner Rio Tinto said it has control over 72 percent of takeover target Riversdale after Brazil’s CSN accepted its offer.
• India should allow exports of wheat and rice as the country has huge grain stocks and global prices are favourable, Farm Minister Sharad Pawar said on Wednesday.
• A top executive at Beijing Automotive Industry Holding Co (BAIC) said on Wednesday the Chinese state auto group was not currently in talks to invest in ailing Swedish car brand Saab, with which it shares some vehicle technology.
• Shares in DB Realty, Unitech and Reliance Communications fell on Wednesday, after a CBI court rejected bail applications of executives involved in the telecoms graft trial.
• Online travel firm Yatra Online Private Ltd said on Wednesday it received 2 billion rupees in funds from investors including Valiant Capital Management, Norwest Venture Partners and Intel Capital.

a volatile trade today at dalal street

• The Sensex closed at 19122, up 31 points from its previous close, and Nifty shut shop at 5741, up 12 points.
• The BSE Sensex eked out a 0.2 percent gain on Tuesday after falling for two consecutive sessions, but trading was volatile and the near-term outlook seemed subdued as investors shunned risk after rating agency Standard & Poor’s lowered its U.S. credit outlook to negative.
• State Bank of India, the country’s largest lender, said on Tuesday it will raise its benchmark lending rate, or base rate, by 25 basis points to 8.5 percent per annum with effect from April 25.
• The Indian government on Tuesday forecast normal rains for the 2011 monsoon, strengthening the prospect for a good farm output that could help bring relief to Asia’s third-largest economy in its battle with high food prices.
• Harley-Davidson Inc reported a wider quarterly profit on Tuesday on higher income from the company’s financial services division and a 3.5 percent increase in sales of new motorcycles.
• The government is risking losing control of inflation, leaving the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) with few tools other than the blunt instrument of more aggressive interest rate increases even as growth momentum slows.
• Falling gas output and a rising subsidy burden are expected to weigh on the respective outlooks of energy major Reliance Industries and explorer Oil and Natural Gas Corp, taking the shine off their likely strong fourth-quarter earnings.
• The Indian rupee pulled back from a 2-1/2 week low touched earlier in the session due some dollar selling at higher levels.
• A German government adviser said on Tuesday that a restructuring of Greek debt was inevitable, raising pressure on Athens to seek a solution to the debt woes that are shaking investor confidence in the euro zone.
• India’s annual headline inflation in April could ease below 8 percent and 2011/12 economic growth should range between 8.75 and 9.25 percent, the chief economic adviser to the finance ministry said on Tuesday.
• Falling gas output and a rising subsidy burden are expected to weigh on the respective outlooks of energy major Reliance Industries and explorer Oil and Natural Gas Corp, taking the shine off their likely strong fourth-quarter earnings.
• A renewed rise in Spanish debt yields is bad news for the euro zone, since it shows Spain is still failing to set itself apart from the zone’s weakest states in the eyes of the markets.
• Some of the United States’ biggest creditors moved to shore up confidence in its sovereign debt on Tuesday after Standard & Poor’s threatened to cut its credit rating on the world’s top economy, touching a nerve among big holders of Treasuries.
• Costly oil could place a major strain on consumer countries with fragile economies, OPEC ministers said on Monday, in their clearest statements yet that they believe fuel demand has shrunk.
• India, which has allowed exports of 500,000 tonnes of sugar following a bumper crop, has asked mills to register starting Tuesday, a source in the food ministry said.
• Foreign direct investment flowing into China rose 29.4 percent to $30.3 billion in the first three months of the year, data showed on Tuesday, as the country’s booming services sector pulled in more funds.
• China will tightly regulate land supply to boost affordable housing and to clamp down harder on illegal land use this year, the Ministry of Land and Resources said on Tuesday, as it seeks to contain housing inflation.
• India’s current account deficit for the last fiscal year that ended in March 2011 is expected to be less than 3 percent, Trade Secretary Rahul Khullar told reporters on Tuesday.

Central-bank strategies

• The Japanese yen has seen dramatic gyrations in its value since the earthquake and tsunami of March 11th. Immediate bets by speculators—or “sneaky thieves”, in the words of one Japanese official—that companies would have to repatriate funds to cover insurance payouts and reconstruction costs led its value to spike following the disaster. Concerned about the impact of a pricey currency on Japan’s post-disaster recovery, the central banks of the G7 countries flooded the market with more than $25 billion of the Japanese currency, sending the yen tumbling by nearly 3% in a single day. It kept on falling, breaching ¥85 to the dollar on April 6th.
• The yen is now being buffeted by opposing forces. When risk perceptions among investors rise—for instance, after the announcement on April 12th that the continuing nuclear crisis in Japan was being upgraded to the same level of seriousness as the Chernobyl disaster—upward pressure is applied to the yen. Analysts reckon that currencies like the yen and the Swiss franc, which are traditionally seen as havens in times of trouble, appreciate whenever investors believe that the environment is riskier. Gold, which hit a record nominal high on April 11th, is another beneficiary of this “flight to safety”.
• The yellow metal also benefits from fears that loose monetary policy and rising oil prices will unleash inflation. Such concerns, and the response to them by the world’s central banks, lie behind a second, downward source of pressure on the yen—the “carry trade”, in which investors borrow in low-yielding currencies to finance investments in higher-yielding ones.
• Many argue that the European Central Bank’s decision on April 7th to raise the policy rate in the euro area, and the prospect of further rises to come, has reinvigorated the carry trade. An interest-rate gap is opening between currencies like the dollar and the yen on the one hand, where monetary policy is likely to remain ultra-loose, and higher-yielding ones like the euro on the other. This gap may explain the strength of the euro, which has risen against the dollar in recent weeks despite endless euro-zone sovereign-debt worries.
• It also explains the sustained appreciation of the Australian dollar, which has strengthened markedly since the start of the year. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) was among the first rich-world central banks to start raising interest rates after virtually all countries had slashed them during the crisis. Australia’s deep economic linkages to booming China via its commodity exports mean that the RBA is unlikely to reverse its policy stance in the near future.
• The Federal Reserve, too, is unlikely to change direction soon, which implies continued dollar weakness. The Fed’s daily index of the dollar’s value against major traded currencies fell to 69.92 on April 8th, the lowest level since May 23rd 2008. Its monthly index of the dollar’s value against major currencies fell in March for the fourth month in a row.
• For Americans concerned about their country’s export prospects, the depressed value of the greenback ought to be good news. In February, the most recent month for which trade data are available, the dollar was 4.5% cheaper in real terms than a year earlier. But although America’s trade deficit did fall in February, it was only because exports fell less steeply than imports. That month’s deficit was still $6 billion higher than a year earlier, when Barack Obama announced a plan to double exports in five years. Achieving that will take more than a cheap currency.

Sensex closed at 19091, losing 296 points

• Indian shares provisionally closed 1.5 percent lower on Monday led by losses in Infosys  and financial stocks, as worries over quarterly earnings and further interest rate increases dampened investor sentiment.
•  Selling pressure in the afternoon took its toll on the markets and forced both the benchmark indices to lose about 1.5% in a single trading session. IT along with interest rate sensitive sectors like realty, banking and capital goods remained the worst performers and auto and a few FMCG counters were only a few stocks that performed a bit better. Selling pressure primarily came from hedge funds and FIIs. The Sensex closed at 19091, down 296 points from its previous close, and Nifty shut shop at 5729, down 95 points. The CNX Midcap index was down 1.5% and the BSE smallcap  index was down 0.8%. The market breadth was negative with advances at 335 against declines of 965 on the NSE. The top Nifty gainers were HUL,Hero Honda, Bajaj Auto and ONGC and prime losers included DLF,HCL tech, Sesa goa and TCS.
•  The Indian rupee erased early gains to trade weaker on Monday afternoon as local shares turned negative and the euro fell sharply.At 2:39 p.m., the partially convertible rupee was at 44.3350/3400 per dollar, almost steady from Friday’s close of 44.3250/3350, but down from Monday’s high of 44.2550.
• World finance leaders must find a way to bring down debt while creating jobs and watching over their shoulders for the threat of inflation, the head of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development said on Saturday.
•  China’s banking regulator will launch a thorough examination this year of loans extended over the past few years, and will tighten the issuance of banking licenses in response to global easing of liquidity, the Shanghai Securities News reported on Monday.
• China still has room to further tighten monetary policy, the official China Securities Journal said in a front-page editorial on Monday.
•  China and India reported higher-than-expected inflation readings on Friday, giving fresh ammunition to central bankers and investors alike who are worried about mounting price pressures in the global economy.
•  India’s food price index rose 8.28 percent and the fuel price index climbed 12.97 percent in the year to April 2, government data on Friday showed.
• The euro sank on Monday and European stocks fell into the red for the year as the rise of a euro-skeptic party in Finland and growing unease about Greek debt battered investor sentiment in the single currency zone.
• Brent crude oil fell $1 a barrel on Monday to below $123 after a cut in output from the world’s top exporter Saudi Arabia raised concern that high prices were hurting demand.
• Spot gold hit a record high and silver rose to a 31-year high on Monday, fueled by concerns of rising inflation globally, while a lingering euro zone sovereign debt crisis continued to boost safe-haven demand in precious metals.
• The euro extended its losses on Monday after repeated attempts to break above a resistance level failed yet again and on renewed worries about euro zone debt problems, giving the dollar a much needed reprieve after the recent sell-off.
• Europe’s debt crisis weighed on financial stocks on Monday, dragging Britain’s top share index lower, while analysts said short-term macro pressures present an attractive longer-term buying opportunities on the FTSE.
• General Motors Co plans to team up with its partners to introduce light commercial vehicles to India, the head of its international operations said on Monday.
• High oil prices represent a potentially major burden for importers with global economic recovery still fragile, leading OPEC ministers said on Monday.

India and foreign investment

• India’s  national monument, in New Delhi, is a tall, broad gate. That is ironic, for the country is hard for foreigners to enter, whether they be individuals trying to get a visa or businesses trying to invest.
• India’s inaccessibility is unfortunate because, to bridge the gap between its weak domestic saving and its high investment needs, it must import capital, especially foreign direct investment (FDI), the least flighty kind. Yet the latest figures are going in the wrong direction. Last year India got just $24 billion in FDI, down by almost a third on 2009. Globally, FDI was flat over the period.
• There are many reasons why foreign companies are put off India, from corruption and bureaucracy to the difficulty of obtaining land. These are problems that must be fixed for the sake of local, as well as international, businesses. But in too many areas foreign firms remain barred from entering the country altogether—railways and legal services, for instance—or are restricted to minority stakes—such as insurance and domestic airlines.
• Indian officialdom realises this must change and, at the pace of a Himalayan glacier, has been opening up. From this month, for instance, foreign firms are allowed into a wider range of agricultural businesses. But many other such reforms are stuck. Given the huge benefits that liberalisation could bring to India’s 1.2 billion people, the government should pluck up courage and fling wide the gates.
• India’s primitive and wasteful retail industry is the most glaring example of the need for foreign investment. The business is dominated by tiny mom-and-pop stores. The near-absence of big supermarket chains means there is no “chill chain” of transport and storage to keep fruit and vegetables fresh from field to shopping-basket. As a result, a quarter or more of such produce is wasted, a catastrophe in a country where so many go hungry. In more advanced retailing systems, less than a tenth is lost. Some big Indian firms are moving into the business, but what is needed is to lift the remaining restrictions on foreign ownership and let in international experts such as Walmart, Tesco and Carrefour.
• Retailing employs more than 30m Indians, so some fear social unrest if the admission of foreign chains puts small shops out of business. But given India’s rapid growth there is plenty of space for supermarkets to expand without killing small stores. Indeed, the tiddlers would be better off buying their supplies from foreign supermarkets than from the inefficient, costly middlemen they rely on now. In any case, such worries are greatly outweighed by the potential benefits to Indian consumers: lower prices and better quality, choice and nutrition. Economists in America talk about the beneficial “Walmart effect” that the ubiquitous cheap chain has had on curbing prices. Indians, as they fret over soaring food costs, might find such a thing a godsend.
• Given the success some Indian companies are now having on the world stage, India’s fear of foreign competition at home seems odd. It is time for the country’s politicians to sweep away such protectionism for good, and declare that India is as ready to take on the world in business as its World Cup-winning team is in cricket.

To make the financial system quite a bit safer

• The sinking of the Titanic led, in time, to a new wave of regulations covering safety at sea. The new rules, which included an edict that ships carry enough lifeboats to accommodate all those on board, struck such a sensible balance between safety and cost that they were soon widely adopted. Britain’s Independent Commission on Banking, chaired by Sir John Vickers, a former chief economist at the Bank of England, hopes to do the same with proposed rules that should make the financial system quite a bit safer, yet without imposing such onerous costs that its recommendations are laughed at all the way to the rubbish bin.
• The two main recommendations in the commission’s interim report, which was released, are that big British banks should hold a lot more equity capital against their assets and should rearrange themselves so that their retail banks can survive (or be plucked to safety) even if the rest of the bank hits a financial iceberg. The commission also wants to beef up the competition on the high street, signalling that Lloyds Banking Group in particular needs to divest more branches than is currently required under European Union rules.
• On capital, the commission reckons that the minimum that systemically important banks should set aside as buffers ought to rise to 10% from the 7% proposed by Basel III. Its reasoning seems to be based on a mixture of research and realism. The interim report argues that there is ample evidence showing that the new Basel standard (which itself is twice as high as before the financial crisis) is far too low, and that even 10% may not be quite enough. The commission seems to have settled on this number in the hope that it will not be so high as to be unceremoniously rejected, and proposes that the additional 3% becomes the new surcharge applied to big and systemically important institutions. There is perhaps hope that in Britain this could become the new standard for large banks. It seems unlikely, however, that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, a huddle of central bankers and regulators, would agree to an equity surcharge this big as the new global standard. People close to the talks seem to think the number agreed to in Basel will be closer to 1% than 3% and largely, if not entirely, composed of convertible capital instruments.
• The Vickers commission’s second big proposal is to have banks ringfence their retail arms. Large universal banks, which combine retail and investment banking, would be allowed to keep playing in the capital markets. They would, however, have to set aside enough capital in separate pools to be sure that either part of the bank could survive without the other.
• The proposals are far less radical than some banks may have feared. They will probably also not cost that much to implement. Industry estimates put the cost of ringfencing at about £5 billion ($8 billion) a year, mainly because funding costs of the separate parts will rise as each will be less diversified than the whole. These estimates are probably overstated. Moreover, the real impact of the commission’s proposals is that they may help to bring about a measure of transparency and market discipline to bank funding.
• Because of its reasonableness, the Vickers commission’s recommendations will be difficult to dismiss. A final report is due in September.

the reformation

• An  disjoint attempt made by IMF to refine it’s thinking on capital control. Foreign capital fled the emerging world in the throes of the economic crisis. Now, lured by their better growth prospects and repelled by rich countries’ low interest rates, money has gushed back into countries like Brazil, Peru, South Africa and Turkey. Paulo Nogueira Batista, Brazil’s executive director at the fund, calls it an “international monetary tsunami”.
• Usually emerging markets welcome foreign capital, which can help finance much-needed investment. But the recent surge has them worried, partly because of its speed and fears of an equally rapid reversal. The IMF reckons that gross inflows have risen to 6% of emerging-world GDP in about a quarter of the time taken for a similar spike before the crisis. Policymakers also fear that this flood of capital could lead to asset-price bubbles and overvalued currencies. Many have implemented measures to stem the tide, from Brazil’s tax on portfolio inflows to Peru’s higher charge on non-residents’ purchases of central-bank paper.
• Such policies—particularly capital controls that apply specifically to foreign investors or treat them differently from nationals—have long been controversial. Countries that use them are often accused of doing so to keep their currencies artificially undervalued. Critics reckon that with their prospects improving emerging markets should just let their currencies rise. But emerging economies retort that the reason capital is flooding their way may have less to do with their long-term prospects than with temporary factors such as unusually loose rich-world monetary policy, over which they have no control. Adding to the confusion is the absence of any internationally accepted guidelines about what is acceptable when it comes to managing capital flows.
• The IMF is the natural arbiter of such issues. It has already stepped back a little from its historical antipathy to capital controls. In February 2010 a research paper by a team of economists at the fund led by Jonathan Ostry cautiously endorsed the use of controls in situations where a country facing a capital surge had a currency that was appropriately valued, had already built up enough reserves and had no further room to tighten fiscal policy. The fund now reckons these conditions are not all that rare. It finds that 9 out of 39 emerging markets studied would have been justified, as of late 2010, in resorting to such controls because they had exhausted other options. There is a need, therefore, for more clarity on which measures are justified, and when.
• On April 5th the IMF released two documents designed to achieve just that. The  first, a “framework” for policy advice that is approved by the fund’s board, lays out the institution’s official thinking. The other, by Mr Ostry and his colleagues, provides the analytical backing for the framework paper and explains the conditions under which various kinds of policy instruments might help manage capital flows. The two papers aim to ensure that the advice the IMF gives member countries is consistent. But several curious differences between them suggest that the fund’s own thinking on managing capital flows is far from settled. In at least two respects the new paper by Mr Ostry’s team marks a further evolution of the fund’s position on capital controls. But the board-endorsed policy framework seems less inclined to budge.
• Earlier IMF papers emphasised that capital controls should be imposed only in the face of temporary surges in inflows, arguing that the exchange rate should adjust when it came to permanent shocks. But Mr Ostry’s team now points out that persistent inflows might be even more dangerous in terms of asset-price bubbles. It concedes that controls may be useful to target inflows that are expected to endure, because of the threat to financial stability. The framework paper is much more conservative, arguing that capital-flow measures “are most appropriate to handle inflows driven by temporary or cyclical factors”.
• The IMF has historically been more favourably disposed towards “prudential” measures, which are designed to stop inflows from destabilising financial systems and do not explicitly discriminate between residents and foreigners, than towards capital controls, which erect barriers designed to stop the exchange rate from rising. Mr Ostry and his colleagues point out that some prudential measures distinguish between local-currency and foreign-currency transactions. This makes them more like capital controls since most foreign-currency liabilities are likely to be owed to foreigners. It may thus make sense to treat such prudential measures and capital controls similarly. The framework paper, however, maintains that countries should “give precedence to capital-flow measures that do not discriminate on the basis of residency (such as currency-based prudential measures)” over those that do. The disconnect is glaring and confusing.
• The fund’s attempts to flesh out what countries threatened by a surge of capital should do come up against a more fundamental problem, too. Many emerging economies argue that the IMF is focusing on the wrong players. Mr Nogueira Batista told a Brazilian newspaper that he objected to “countries that adopt ultra-expansive monetary policy to get over the crisis [and] provoke an expansion of liquidity on a global scale”, and which then insist on guidelines about how recipients should behave. (Indeed, emerging economies were firmly opposed to the fund’s original plan to refer to what is now a “framework” for policy advice as the more prescriptive-sounding “guidelines”.) The fund acknowledges that these “push factors” are important, and should be addressed. Its own analysis suggests that American interest rates have a larger effect on flows to emerging economies than those economies’ own growth performance.
• A fund insider says that negotiations around the new framework on capital-flow measures were “the most contentious that any staffer can remember”. It shows.

interest rates and the economy

• In November 2003 the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee (MPC) raised interest rates by 0.25%, the first increase in almost four years. With hindsight, it seems a straightforward decision. The economy was growing steadily, unemployment was low, house prices were shooting up and banks were lending freely. Yet at the time there was great anxiety about the change. The fear was that the increased burden of consumer debt would make even a small rise in interest rates bear down heavily on spending.
• That worry is all the greater now, as the bank contemplates a similar move. As The Economist went to press on April 7th the MPC was expected to keep its benchmark rate at 0.5%—but a quarter-point increase seems likely as soon as next month. Debt is worse, relative to incomes, than in 2003 (see chart). Other pressures on household finances are greater now than then. Wage growth is sluggish; inflation is far higher; job prospects are poorer. And taxes are going up. In the circumstances, an increase in interest rates could easily provoke a damaging cutback in spending by nervous consumers. One big, if subtle, reason for concern is the stark polarisation between the cash-rich and the debt-poor.
• If each household had an equal share of the cash and debt held by all, there would be little to worry about. True, personal debt is around 1.5 times post-tax income, which means that a percentage point increase in interest rates, if fully passed on by lenders, would take up 1.5% of income in higher debt-service costs. On the other hand, the income effects of interest-rate changes do not work in only one direction. Households in aggregate also have large cash deposits, and higher interest rates raise the income that is earned on them. The stock of cash is a bit smaller than the stock of debt, so the overall effect of interest-rate increases would be to depress household income. But as long as deposit rates rise in tandem with borrowing costs, the cost of a percentage point rise in rates would be less than 0.3% of incomes.
• That reckoning, however, understates the likely impact. Analysing the debt and cash holdings of all consumers lumped together reveals little about the effect of interest-rate increases on spending. That actually depends on how the aggregate cash hoard and debt burden is divided.
• People typically do not have both large debts and piles of cash, since it would make sense to use the latter to pay off the former. Rather there is a financial spectrum with, at one end, debt-laden householders, usually young, who have recently taken on a hefty mortgage and have little spare cash; and at the other end, older savers who have paid off their mortgages, or who have traded down to smaller homes and banked the proceeds.
• These different sorts of consumers will respond to interest-rate increases in ways that are unlikely to be neutral for the economy. The indebted will cut their spending to free up the extra cash to service their loans. Once rates start to rise, those with the biggest debts might be anxious to save harder to pay down those debts at a faster pace. At the other financial pole, the cash-rich and debt-free (by definition savers not spenders) might well spend little, if any, of the extra income they gain from higher deposit rates.
• Any squeeze on debtors’ incomes might be mitigated if banks chose not to pass on any increase in funding costs stemming from higher base rates. That scenario is optimistic. The gap or “spread” between the Bank of England’s rate and the average interest rate on mortgages (which account for four-fifths of household debt) has narrowed a bit recently, though it is much higher than before the financial crisis. This narrowing owes little, it seems, to banks competing more vigorously for mortgage business. Rather it reflects lower rates for borrowers whose fixed-rate deals had expired and lapsed into cheaper variable-rate mortgages.
• In one sense, this is helpful: it has lifted the incomes of some borrowers at the banks’ expense. But it has also made the economy more sensitive to changes in short-term interest rates. Before the crisis, around half of mortgages were at variable interest rates; by the end of last year, the share had risen to 69%. This greater sensitivity is heightened by the fragile state of Britain’s housing market. Higher rates will crimp the already-weak demand for homes and weigh on house prices—perhaps spurring anxious borrowers to spend less and pay off their mortgages quickly.
• A big enough interest-rate shock would start a downward spiral in debtors’ finances, spending and house prices. Rising defaults would exacerbate the damage. For this reason, the MPC is likely to tread carefully. The “glacial pace” at which interest rates are likely to rise—perhaps 0.25 percentage points every three months or so—is unlikely to be dangerous, reckons Kevin Daly of Goldman Sachs. If spending suffers unduly, “the MPC would be able to deal with it,” he says.
• The polarisation of household finances that makes the impact of a rate rise so uncertain also helps to explain why some MPC members feel the need to act. Debtors are hoping that interest rates stay low, but savers and bondholders need to be reassured that today’s high inflation won’t be allowed to persist. A small rate increase would be a victory for savers. The needs of the economy mean that, overall, monetary policy will continue to favour debtors.

falling public support for capitalism.

• Rising debt and lost output are the common measures of the cost of the financial crisis. But a new global opinion poll shows another, perhaps more serious form of damage: falling public support for capitalism. This is most marked in the country that used to epitomise free enterprise. In 2002, 80% of Americans agreed that the world’s best bet was the free-market system. By 2010 that support had fallen to 59%, only a little above the 54% average for the 25 countries polled. Nominally Communist China is now one of the world’s strongest supporters of capitalism, at 68%, up from 66% in 2002. Brazil scores 68% too. Germany squeaks into top place with 69%.
• France, one of the world’s strongest economies, continues as an anti-capitalist outlier. Only 6% of French “strongly” support the free market, down from an already puny 8% in 2002. Add those who “somewhat agree” with capitalism’s superiority and the figure is 30%, down from 42% in 2002. Turkey (another free-market success story) had the same level of support then, but it has dropped even lower, to a mere 27%. In Europe only Spain seems to buck the trend, rising from 37% in 2002 to 51% . Indians, on paper big winners from free-market reforms, appear unimpressed: support has dropped to 58% from 73%.
• Capitalism’s waning fortunes are starkly visible among Americans earning below $20,000. Their support for the free market has dropped from 76% to 44% in just one year. The research was conducted by GlobeScan, a polling firm. Its chairman Doug Miller says American business is “close to losing its social contract” with average familie

Big oil firms are offloading their refineries to different kinds of buyer

• The twinkling lights of an oil refinery at dusk show the potential for beauty in industrial landscapes. But the dramatic silhouettes, part ocean liner, part funfair, disguise the difficulties within. Decades of poor returns from turning crude oil into petrol, diesel and other fuels have convinced the Western oil giants to get out of the business. In their place come mainly state-run oil firms from Asia, the Middle East and Latin America, and private equity
• Essar, an Indian conglomerate, this week paid Shell $1.3 billion for the Stanlow refinery in north-west England. In February, state-owned PetroChina paid $1 billion for a half-share in Scotland’s Grangemouth refinery and in another at Lavéra in the south of France. Many more refineries are for sale in Europe and America. Britain’s BP, which is raising cash to pay the bill for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, wants to sell two huge ones in America. Valero, an American refiner, may show interest, though it has just bought a plant in Wales from Chevron for $1.75 billion.
• American private-equity firms may also be taking a look at BP’s plants. According to FACTS Global Energy, a consultancy, over the past two years private-equity buyers have snapped up refining capacity of around 1m barrels of crude a day (b/d). State-backed oil companies, such as PetroChina and Russia’s Rosneft, have bought nearly the same amount.
• The refining business has suffered from chronic overcapacity, and thus weak margins, since the 1970s oil shocks, which led to a slump in the use of oil-based fuels for generating electricity and heating homes. A respite came in 2005-07, as a buoyant rich world and increasingly thirsty emerging economies boosted demand. But that was a high point that the rich world may not hit again. Demand for petrol in America has fallen, and may never regain its previous peak. Refining margins, having touched $4.50 a barrel, are down to one-tenth of that and still falling.
• It makes sense for big Western oil companies to get out of such an unprofitable business and put the capital into exploration and drilling. But refineries’ weak margins are not deterring oil firms from emerging economies from buying them. One reason is that they are going cheap. This gives the buyers access to declining but still sizeable rich-world markets. Such access is especially useful for those with ambitions to become global oil traders.
• As they buy refineries abroad, emerging-market firms continue to build them back home, where demand is still booming. For those firms owned or backed by their home governments, there are other considerations besides commercial ones. China, although it is set to remain a big importer of crude, is desperate to become at least self–sufficient in refining. By 2015 it will boost its domestic capacity by 20%, taking the total to 12m b/d. Middle Eastern oil producers are also building refining capacity to add value to the crude that they pump out of the ground.
• All this extra capacity will keep global refining margins under pressure for at least another five or six years, believes Francis Osborne of Wood Mackenzie, a consultancy. That may not bother state oil companies much, but it ought to worry private-equity firms. So why are they buying? First, because prices are so low. Second, because they are looking optimistically to the long term. Martin Brand of Blackstone, a private-equity giant that has bought three refineries in America in recent years, thinks margins will have recovered in ten years’ time, and in the interim there will be plenty of efficiency gains to be made.
• Others are sceptical. The European and American refineries’ new owners will be far less likely to close them than their old ones. In the absence of such a rationalisation of capacity, thinks Gemma Gouldby of FACTS Global Energy, margins will stay poor indefinitely. If so, the Western oil majors will be glad they got rid of them.

struggle of sense to get out of negative bias

• The markets continue to trade volatile in the negative terrain, but above their intraday lows. At 11:05 a.m., the Bombay Stock Exchange’s Sensex was at 19,555.70, down 56.50 points or 0.29% from the previous close, while the National Stock Exchange’s Nifty was at 5,874.30, down 17.45 points or 0.3%.
• Indian shares eased a tad on Thursday as investors were in consolidation mode after a big rally in March, while underlying sentiment remained upbeat following a spurt in foreign fund buying.
• Maruti was trading down 1.3 percent at 1,277.95 rupees after the company said it would recall 13,157 diesel engine cars.
• Foreign funds have pumped around $2.8 billion into equities since the start of March, after being net sellers in the first two months, on hopes a market correction made the market attractive given economic growth was still robust.
• Global demand for dairy products will jump in the next decade, led by surging consumption in China and India, according to Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd, the world’s largest exporter.
• Oil dropped from the highest in 30 months in New York after China raised domestic fuel prices and U.S. stockpiles climbed, stoking speculation demand may falter in the world’s biggest energy users.
• Gold declined on speculation that investors are locking in gains after the price rose to a record earlier, and as central bank efforts to combat inflation curbed demand for precious metals.
• Asian stocks rose as the yen weakened against all of its most-traded currencies and after gold prices rose to a record for a second day in New York on demand for the precious metal as a hedge against inflation.
• Indian imports of power-station coal rose by 33% to 65.7 million metric tons in the year ending March 2011 from 49.4 million a year earlier, India Coal Market Watch said, citing estimates based on port data.
• World trade will grow faster than the 7 percent long-term average rate for a second successive year in 2011 but fall short of last year’s dramatic rebound, the World Trade Organisation is likely to forecast on Thursday.
• China may be heading for a pause in its half-year cycle of monetary tightening, raising interest rates just once more this year as its moves so far start to slow inflation and economic activity.
• The U.S. economy remains too fragile for the Federal Reserve to begin raising interest rates, the president of the Atlanta Fed, Dennis Lockhart, said on Wednesday.
• Portugal’s decision to seek international aid removes a cloud of uncertainty over the euro zone and has a good chance of ending the spread of debt market crises to fresh countries in the region.
• Chinese economy probably grew less quickly in the first quarter of this year than the final quarter of 2010, dovetailing with the government’s efforts to shift more emphasis to the quality rather than the pace of growth.
• Portugal’s caretaker government, fighting to avoid a bailout, said on Wednesday a political crisis had caused “irreparable damage” after borrowing costs rocketed as it sold a billion euros in short-term debt.
• The euro will steadily lose the recent ground it has gained against the dollar in the coming year as the U.S. Federal Reserve plays catch-up to the European Central Bank’s interest rate hikes, a Reuters poll found.
• India’s record grains output in 2011 may prompt the government to allow wheat exports, Farm Minister Sharad Pawar said on Wednesday, boosting the prospect of overseas sales of the grain from the world’s second – biggest producer.
• Some of Asia’s emerging economies are showing signs of overheating, underscoring the need for further policy tightening and more flexible foreign exchange rates to tackle growing inflationary pressures, the Asian Development Bank said on Wednesday.
• U.S. congressional negotiators on Wednesday raced against a looming deadline to agree on billions of dollars in spending cuts and find a budget deal that keeps the federal government operating beyond Friday.
• Europe has opened flat and is trading mixed. The Indian market is now in the green but still in flat territory with the heavyweights proving to be a drag in today’s trade. Sensex is trading at 19624, up 12 points from its previous close, and Nifty is at 5896, up 4 points.( 01:23 pm,india).
• Leading India Inc representatives today made a strong plea to the Reserve Bank to review its rate tightening policy, saying the high cost of credit is having an adverse impact on growth.
• Cairn Energy and Vedanta Resources on Thursday extended the deadline for a $9.6 billion deal for Cairn’s India assets, reflecting optimism the deal will get done a day after the government deferred a decision. Both companies have extended the date by which all conditions must be completed or waived to 20 May 2011 to accommodate the completion of the open offer for Cairn India shares, Cairn Energy said in a statement.
• Food inflation fell to 9.18 per cent for the week ended March 26, the lowest level in almost four months, on the back of a decline in the prices of pulses.
• The European Central Bank is poised to raise interest rates from a record low 1.0 percent on Thursday and more is likely to follow but, fearful of heaping more pain on the euro zone’s stragglers, it will give few clues about when the next move will come.
• Maruti Suzuki India (MSIL), the country’s largest car maker, on Wednesday said it wouldrecall 13,157 diesel cars manufactured between November 13 and December 4, 2010, to examine a possible faulty engine part.
• The foreign institutional investors (FIIs) were net buyers of Rs 150.85 crore in futures and options segment on Wednesday.According to the data released by the NSE, FIIs were net sellers of index futures to the tune of Rs 117.33 crore, while they sold index options worth Rs 587.96 crore.They were net sellers of stock futures to the tune of Rs 305.01 crore and sold stock options worth Rs 14.77 crore.
• Oil producing countries that have surplus production capacity provided international oil companies with additional quantities of crude, UAE Energy Minister Mohammed bin Dha’en Al Hameli has said.Addressing the 12th International Oil Summit in Paris on Wednesday, Al Hameli said that OPEC members are not the only producers that are providing additional supplies, noting that non-OPEC supplies were expected to reach 500,000 barrels a day this year.
• The Union government has slapped an excise duty of 10% on jute products that constitute about 80% of the Rs 6,000 crore industry and threatens to cripple the fate of 2.5 lakh workers.